Re: [PATCH] [MTD] Fix JFFS2 sync silent failure

From: JÃrn Engel
Date: Thu Apr 22 2010 - 07:55:56 EST


On Thu, 22 April 2010 12:39:53 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> Here's a series for fixing these. At this point they are totally
> untested except that I did compile them. Note that your analysis
> appeared correct for all cases but ocfs2, which does use get_sb_bdev()
> and hence gets ->s_bdi assigned.
>
> You can see them here, I'll post the series soon:
>
> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-linus
>
> The first patch is a helper addition, the rest are per-fs fixups.

Looks good at a cursory glance. What's still missing is some sort of
assertion. You are a smart person and missed this problem, twice even.
Even if you hadn't, a not so smart person can add a new filesystem and
miss s_bdi, like I did. We want some automatism to catch this.

JÃrn

--
"Security vulnerabilities are here to stay."
-- Scott Culp, Manager of the Microsoft Security Response Center, 2001
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/