Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock

[Glauber Costa]

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:19:38AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 04/19/2010 07:26 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> Is the problem that the tscs are starting out of sync, or that they're
> >> drifting relative to each other over time?  Do the problems become worse
> >> the longer the uptime?  How large are the offsets we're talking about here?
> >>     
> > The offsets usually seem pretty small, under a microsecond. So I don't think
> > it has anything to do with tscs starting out of sync. Specially because the
> > delta-based calculation has the exact purpose of handling that case.
> >   
> 
> So you think they're drifting out of sync from an initially synced
> state?  If so, what would bound the drift?
I think delta calculation introduces errors.

Marcelo can probably confirm it, but he has a nehalem with an appearently
very good tsc source. Even this machine warps.

It stops warping if we only write pvclock data structure once and forget it,
(which only updated tsc_timestamp once), according to him.

Obviously, we can't do that everywhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/