Re: [PATCH] [MTD] Fix JFFS2 sync silent failure

From: JÃrn Engel
Date: Mon Apr 19 2010 - 07:40:13 EST


On Mon, 19 April 2010 12:20:56 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> Care to send your jffs2 patch separately to David? Then I'll commit a
> modified variant for complaining about missing ->s_bdi on mount.

Sure.

David, this patch is untested. It looks trivially correct and fixes a
nasty bug, but I don't test jffs2 and only noticed the problem in
passing.

JÃrn

--
Maintenance in other professions and of other articles is concerned with
the return of the item to its original state; in Software, maintenance
is concerned with moving an item away from its original state.
-- Les Belady

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdsuper.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdsuper.c
index af8b42e..7c00319 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdsuper.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdsuper.c
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ static int get_sb_mtd_set(struct super_block *sb, void *_mtd)

sb->s_mtd = mtd;
sb->s_dev = MKDEV(MTD_BLOCK_MAJOR, mtd->index);
+ sb->s_bdi = mtd->backing_dev_info;
return 0;
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/