Re: [PATCH 3/8] USB: gadget: __init and __exit tags removed

[MichaÅ Nazarewicz]

> 2010/4/19 MichaÅ Nazarewicz:
> > Yes, I agree.  That's why in the first version I proposed the
> > __usb_init, __usb_exit, etc. tags which could be customized
> > prior to including composite related files.

Mike Frysinger:
> seems like __usbgadget_xxx would be better naming, but i'm not
> interested in fighting to get the idea in general accepted

Bit long though, but yes makes more sense.

> > What's more, I don't see any other (that is cleaner) solution which
> > would allow flexibility so it seems what we can either choose
> > a non-flexible solution proposed by this patch or an ugly solution
> > proposed by my previous patch.

> i dont have a problem with your current patch (since there are still
> seciton mismatch warnings floating about that i imagine this is going
> to fix), just with the general situation

Yes, I understand that.  I'm just clarifying the situation we are in
so maybe someone will came up with some better solution then the ones
already proposed.

--
Best regards,                                           _     _
  .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of       o' \,=./ `o
  ..o | Computer Science,  MichaÅ "mina86" Nazarewicz     (o o)
  ooo +---[mina86@xxxxxxxxxx]---[mina86@jabber.org]---ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/