Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] max3100: added raise_threaded_irq

[christian pellegrin]

Hi,


On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I wonder whether we should restrict this mechanism to threaded
> handlers or just implement it in the following way:
>
.....
> This will not work out of the box when the irq is nested into some
> demultiplexing thread handler (IRQF_NESTED_THREAD).
>

OK, I see. The solution you proposed has many other uses such testing
of interrupt handlers in general. I will try to do some work along the
line you suggested next week.

Thank you!


-- 
Christian Pellegrin, see http://www.evolware.org/chri/
"Real Programmers don't play tennis, or any other sport which requires
you to change clothes. Mountain climbing is OK, and Real Programmers
wear their climbing boots to work in case a mountain should suddenly
spring up in the middle of the computer room."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/