Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/16] rcu: make dead code really dead

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:52:52PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:13:25AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > cleanup: make dead code really dead
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcutree.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > index e54c123..6042fb8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -1236,11 +1236,11 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
> >  		break; /* grace period idle or initializing, ignore. */
> >  
> >  	case RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK:
> > -
> > -		raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);  /* irqs remain disabled */
> >  		if (RCU_SIGNAL_INIT != RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK)
> >  			break; /* So gcc recognizes the dead code. */
> 
> GCC's new __builtin_unreachable would help here, though obviously we
> can't count on 4.5 or newer quite yet.  A wrapper in compiler.h would
> let us use it when available though.

So at some time when we can count on gcc 4.5 or newer, the code
would look something like the following?

	if (RCU_SIGNAL_INIT == RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK)
		this_is_unreachable();

I suppose that in the meantime one could supply the code to use
in the unreachable case:

	if (RCU_SIGNAL_INIT == RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK)
		this_is_unreachable(break);

But this is beginning to seem a bit strained to me.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/