Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: delegate pageout io to flusher thread if current is kswapd

[Suleiman Souhlal]

On Apr 15, 2010, at 2:32 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:05:57AM -0700, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
> > On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:11 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> > > Now, vmscan pageout() is one of IO throuput degression source.
> > > Some IO workload makes very much order-0 allocation and reclaim
> > > and pageout's 4K IOs are making annoying lots seeks.
> > >
> > > At least, kswapd can avoid such pageout() because kswapd don't
> > > need to consider OOM-Killer situation. that's no risk.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > What's your opinion on trying to cluster the writes done by pageout,
> > instead of not doing any paging out in kswapd?
>
> XFS already does this in ->writepage to try to minimise the impact
> of the way pageout issues IO. It helps, but it is still not as good
> as having all the writeback come from the flusher threads because
> it's still pretty much random IO.

Doesn't the randomness become irrelevant if you can cluster enough
pages?

> And, FWIW, it doesn't solve the stack usage problems, either. In
> fact, it will make them worse as write_one_page() puts another
> struct writeback_control on the stack...

Sorry, this patch was not meant to solve the stack usage problems.

-- Suleiman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/