Re: sched_clock - microblaze

[Michal Simek]

Steven J. Magnani wrote:
> Michal,
>
> On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 16:55 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> > Is unimplemented sched_clock the reason why ftrace not show fine grain time?
> >
> > Or is there any other thing which is wrong?
>
> I think that's it. On my platform we have a free-running 1 MHz counter
> so I implemented a platform sched_clock for that, and I get nice ftrace
> times.
>
>  0) + 65.000 us   |  finish_task_switch();
>  0)               |  lock_sock_nested() {
>  0) + 52.000 us   |    local_bh_disable();
>  0) + 53.000 us   |    local_bh_enable();
>  0) ! 264.000 us  |  }

I don't understand why I should add any "new" free running counter 
because we have one free running counter which do it (clocksource timer 
- timer1). Or am I missing something?

Thanks for sending your code.
Michal



--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/