Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: delegate pageout io to flusher thread if current is kswapd

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Thu Apr 15 2010 - 07:26:23 EST


> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:11:37PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Now, vmscan pageout() is one of IO throuput degression source.
> > Some IO workload makes very much order-0 allocation and reclaim
> > and pageout's 4K IOs are making annoying lots seeks.
> >
> > At least, kswapd can avoid such pageout() because kswapd don't
> > need to consider OOM-Killer situation. that's no risk.
> >
>
> Well, there is some risk here. Direct reclaimers may not be cleaning
> more pages than it had to previously except it splices subsystems
> together increasing stack usage and causing further problems.
>
> It might not cause OOM-killer issues but it could increase the time
> dirty pages spend on the LRU.
>
> Am I missing something?

No. you are right. I fully agree your previous mail. so, I need to cool down a bit ;)







--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/