Re: [PATCH] mm: disallow direct reclaim page writeback

[Andi Kleen]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The only part of the 4K stack code that's good is the separate
> > interrupt stack, but that one should be just combined with a sane 8K 
> > process stack.
> 
> The reality is that if you are blowing a 4K process stack you are
> probably playing russian roulette on the current 8K x86-32 stack as well
> because of the non IRQ split. So it needs fixing either way

Yes I think the 8K stack on 32bit should be combined with a interrupt 
stack too. There's no reason not to have an interrupt stack ever. 

Again the problem with fixing it is that you won't have any safety net
for a slightly different stacking etc. path that you didn't cover.

That said extreme examples (like some of those Chris listed) definitely
need fixing by moving them to different threads. But even after that
you still want a safety net. 4K is just too near the edge.

Maybe it would work if we never used any indirect calls, but that's
clearly not the case.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/