Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix accidentally preprocessed snprintf callback

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:41:16AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:37:48AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > struct sort_entry has a callback named snprintf that turns an
> > entry into a string result.
> > 
> > But there are glibc versions that implement snprintf through a
> > macro. The following expression is then going to get the snprintf
> > call preprocessed:
> > 
> > 	ent->snprintf(...)
> > 
> > to finally end up in a build error:
> > 
> > 	util/hist.c: Dans la fonction «hist_entry__snprintf» :
> > 	util/hist.c:539: erreur: «struct sort_entry» has no member named «__builtin___snprintf_chk»
> > 
> > To fix this, rename struct sort_entry::snprintf() callback to
> > to_string(), assuming at least Java methods naming won't ever
> > conflict with perf.
> 
> 
> Note I'm not entirely happy with this to_string() renaming.
> May be append_string() would have been better. I don't know.
> snprintf() was just too good.
> If you think about something else, don't hesistate to change,
> or I can change it myself if you want.

psnprintf() I guess, the intent was exactly to mean that it is indeed
similar to snprintf... dammit, there is already a psnprintf out there
:-\

Perhaps just do it as ->he_snprintf and have the other methods as well
prefixed with he as a shorthand for hist_entry, that is what the methods
operate, besides the string, ok?

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/