Re: [PATCH] ARM: dmabounce: fix partial sync in dma_sync_single_*API

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Mon Apr 12 2010 - 15:36:20 EST


On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 12:39:32PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> I don't have arm hardware that uses dmabounce so I can't confirm the
> problem but seems that dmabounce doesn't work for some drivers...

Patch reviews fine, except for one niggle. I too don't have hardware
I can test (well, I do except the kernel stopped supporting the UDA1341
audio codec on the SA1110 Neponset.)

> @@ -171,10 +172,17 @@ find_safe_buffer(struct dmabounce_device_info *device_info, dma_addr_t safe_dma_
> read_lock_irqsave(&device_info->lock, flags);
>
> list_for_each_entry(b, &device_info->safe_buffers, node)
> - if (b->safe_dma_addr == safe_dma_addr) {
> - rb = b;
> - break;
> - }
> + if (for_sync) {
> + if (b->safe_dma_addr <= safe_dma_addr &&
> + safe_dma_addr < b->safe_dma_addr + b->size) {
> + rb = b;
> + break;
> + }
> + } else
> + if (b->safe_dma_addr == safe_dma_addr) {
> + rb = b;
> + break;
> + }

This is the niggle; I don't like this indentation style. If you want to
indent this if () statement, then please format like this:

} else {
if (b->safe...) {
...
}
}

or format it as:

} else if (b->safe...) {
...
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/