Re: [PATCH -tip v2 7/8] perf probe: Remove die() from probe-findercode

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:20:22AM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 07:18:38PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>>>>>  	tvar->value = xstrdup(regs);
>>>>>  	if (ref) {
>>>>>  		tvar->ref = xzalloc(sizeof(struct kprobe_trace_arg_ref));
>>>
>>> We have to kill those xzcalloc, etc, too they are die() in disguise :-)
>>
>> Hmm, I think that will cost high, because only failing to allocate memory,
>> which theoretically means we can't continue to operate it. In that case,
>> we'd better just use backtrace() and die().
> 
> Consider a situation where we are trying to allocate lots of objects
> allocated for some big operation (adding probes for all functions in all
> threads, whatever), we can just say to the user "hey, you don't have
> memory to do this" but other operations are possible, so calling
> panic(), oops, die() is not the right thing to do.

Hmm, OK, so we'd better remove wrapper.c...

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/