Re: [PATCH 0/9] jump label v6

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sat Apr 10 2010 - 02:24:08 EST


On 04/09/2010 11:16 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Finally, please abstract out the jump label and string address
> type. Even on 64-bit sparc all of the kernel addresses are 32-bits
> so we can use "u32" for all of the addresses jump label wants to
> record. This will decrease the jump label section size. There is
> at least one other 64-bit platform that can benefit from this,
> which I think is s390x if I'm not mistaken.
>

Even on x86 they're 32 bits -- but signed.

-hpa


--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/