Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_unshare: simplify the not-really-implementedCLONE_THREAD/SIGHAND/VM code

From: Roland McGrath
Date: Fri Apr 09 2010 - 16:03:40 EST

Next message: Frantisek Rysanek: "setitimer vs. threads: SIGALRM returned to which thread? (process master or individual child)"
Previous message: Roland McGrath: "Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] proc: make task_sig() lockless"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Frantisek Rysanek: "setitimer vs. threads: SIGALRM returned to which thread? (process master or individual child)"
Previous message: Roland McGrath: "Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] proc: make task_sig() lockless"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]