Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems

[Pedro Ribeiro]

On 9 April 2010 19:09, Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:01:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
>> > here is the output of the patch you sent me when the interference is triggered.
>> >
>> > The log is long, 1.3mb in size.
>>
>> I don't see anything suspicious.  The transfer_buffer addresses repeat
>> every 32 URBs, and the DMA addresses cycle almost entirely uniformly
>> from 0x20000000 to 0x23ffffff in units of 0x2000 (there are a few gaps
>> where the interval is a little bigger).
>
> The DMA pointers do indeed look sane. I wanted to take a deeper look at
> this and set up a 64bit system today. However, I fail to see the problem
> here. Pedro, how much RAM does your machine have installed?
>
> Daniel
>
>

It has 4 GB.

Pedro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/