Re: [PATCH 02/13] mm: Revalidate anon_vma in page_lock_anon_vma()

[Minchan Kim]

Hi, Peter.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There is nothing preventing the anon_vma from being detached while we
> are spinning to acquire the lock. Most (all?) current users end up
> calling something like vma_address(page, vma) on it, which has a
> fairly good chance of weeding out wonky vmas.
>
> However suppose the anon_vma got freed and re-used while we were
> waiting to acquire the lock, and the new anon_vma fits with the
> page->index (because that is the only thing vma_address() uses to
> determine if the page fits in a particular vma, we could end up
> traversing faulty anon_vma chains.

We have second defense rule by page_check_address.
Before anon_vma is detached, pte of pages on the anon_vma should be zeroed.
So can't page_check_address close the race?

Thanks for good trial for good feature.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/