Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded

From: Patrick McHardy
Date: Thu Apr 08 2010 - 07:41:10 EST


Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:09:45 PDT, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2010-04-05-16-09 has been uploaded to
>>
>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>
> Seen in dmesg, 2.6.34-rc2-mmotm0323 didn't do this. Tossing it at all the
> likely suspects, hopefully somebody will recognize it and save me the
> bisecting. ;)
>
> [ 11.488535] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink.
> [ 11.488579]
> [ 11.488579] ===================================================
> [ 11.489529] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> [ 11.489988] ---------------------------------------------------
> [ 11.490494] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> [ 11.491024]
> [ 11.491024] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 11.491025]
> [ 11.492834]
> [ 11.492835] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> [ 11.494124] 1 lock held by swapper/1:
> [ 11.494776] #0: (nf_ct_ecache_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8148c606>] nf_conntrack_register_notifier+0x1a/0x76
> [ 11.495505]

There are some unnecessary rcu_dereference() calls in the conntrack
notifier registration and unregistration functions.

Does this fix it?

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
index d5a9bcd..849614a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
@@ -81,11 +81,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_deliver_cached_events);
int nf_conntrack_register_notifier(struct nf_ct_event_notifier *new)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct nf_ct_event_notifier *notify;

mutex_lock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
- notify = rcu_dereference(nf_conntrack_event_cb);
- if (notify != NULL) {
+ if (nf_conntrack_event_cb != NULL) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -101,11 +99,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_register_notifier);

void nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier(struct nf_ct_event_notifier *new)
{
- struct nf_ct_event_notifier *notify;
-
mutex_lock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
- notify = rcu_dereference(nf_conntrack_event_cb);
- BUG_ON(notify != new);
+ BUG_ON(nf_conntrack_event_cb != new);
rcu_assign_pointer(nf_conntrack_event_cb, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
}
@@ -114,11 +109,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier);
int nf_ct_expect_register_notifier(struct nf_exp_event_notifier *new)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct nf_exp_event_notifier *notify;

mutex_lock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
- notify = rcu_dereference(nf_expect_event_cb);
- if (notify != NULL) {
+ if (nf_expect_event_cb != NULL) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -134,11 +127,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_expect_register_notifier);

void nf_ct_expect_unregister_notifier(struct nf_exp_event_notifier *new)
{
- struct nf_exp_event_notifier *notify;
-
mutex_lock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
- notify = rcu_dereference(nf_expect_event_cb);
- BUG_ON(notify != new);
+ BUG_ON(nf_expect_event_cb != new);
rcu_assign_pointer(nf_expect_event_cb, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
}