Re: [patch 3/3] sched: Use local_irq_save_nmi() in cpu_clock()

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Since we can call cpu_clock() from NMI context fix up the IRQ
> disabling to conform to the new rules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_clock.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
> @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
>  	unsigned long long clock;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	local_irq_save_nmi(flags);
>  	clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +	local_irq_restore_nmi(flags);
>  
>  	return clock;
>  }


That seem to add a small overhead in various places.
Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi == local_irq_save
for archs that have native nmi?

Or cpu_clock_nmi()?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/