Re: [PATCH 10/14] Add /sys trigger for per-node memory compaction

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:31:48 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A cgroup which controls placement of memory is cpuset.

err, yes, that.

> One idea is per cpuset. But per-node seems ok.

Which is superior?

Which maps best onto the way systems are used (and onto ways in which
we _intend_ that systems be used)?

Is the physical node really the best unit-of-administration?  And is
direct access to physical nodes the best means by which admins will
manage things?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/