Re: [PATCH V2 0/6][RFC] futex: FUTEX_LOCK with optional adaptivespinning

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Alan Cox wrote:

> > > IMO the best solution is to spin in userspace while the lock holder is
> > > running, fall into the kernel when it is scheduled out.
> > 
> > That's just not realistic as user space has no idea whether the lock
> > holder is running or not and when it's scheduled out without a syscall :)
> 
> Which is the real problem that wants addressing and can be addressed very
> cheaply. That would bring us up to par with 1970s RTOS environments ;)

Well, 1970's RTOSes had other features as well like preemption disable
mechanisms and other interesting stuff. I hope you're not going to
propose that next to bring us up to par with those :)

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/