Re: [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: Add APERF/MPERF support for AMD processors

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Thu Apr 01 2010 - 06:36:27 EST


From: Marvin <marvin24@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:01:04AM +0200

> > From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Starting with model 10 of Family 0x10, AMD processors may have
> > support for APERF/MPERF. Add support for identifying it and using
> > it within cpufreq. Move the APERF/MPERF functions out of the
> > acpi-cpufreq code and into their own file so they can easily be
> > shared.
>
> just out of interest: what are the realnames of these processors (>= Mangy-Core) ?

Well, you're going to have to wait and see. Or search the net :)

> > Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Makefile | 4 +-
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 44 +-----------------------
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/mperf.c | 50
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/mperf.h |
> > 9 +++++
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 8 ++++
> > 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/mperf.c
>
> this file has no copyright or module license, thus tainting my kernel...

This is not a standalone module but only an auxiliary. How does that
taint your kernel? dmesg, .config please.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating Systems Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/