Re: [PATCH] lockdep fix incorrect percpu usage

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 09:45 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra (peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 23:34 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > Should use per_cpu_ptr() to obfuscate the per cpu pointers (RELOC_HIDE is needed
> > > for per cpu pointers).
> > > 
> > > git blame points to commit:
> > > 
> > > lockdep.c: commit 8e18257d29238311e82085152741f0c3aa18b74d
> > > 
> > > But it's really just moving the code around. But it's enough to say that the
> > > problems appeared before Jul 19 01:48:54 2007, which brings us back to 2.6.23.
> > > 
> > > So it should be applied to stable 2.6.23.x to 2.6.33.x (or whichever of these
> > > stable branches are still maintained) and to mainline 2.6.34-rc2.
> > 
> > well, definately not to mainline, since that code is utterly busted in
> > mainline due to recent per-cpu changes.
> 
> How recent ? I'm based on 
> 
> commit f57d4e859a8acd63f878cd0534ec4b990b1710dc
> Merge: 0528faa... eed6351...
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> Date:   Mon Mar 29 18:56:00 2010 +0200
> 
> from -tip and I see the problem there, both in module.c and lockdep.c.

Yeah, its basically been busted since the early merge window period,
hopefully Tejun's patches will make it in soon:

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/10/79



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/