Re: [PATCH] net/wireless/libertas: do not call wiphy_unregister() w/o wiphy_register()

[Holger Schurig]

> I don't get your point. The patch I submitted fixes an Ooops in the
> driver, due to wrong handling of an API. What does that have to do with
> principle discussions about the frameworks in use?

I asked if there is a better method, and you said that you would test a better 
solution. That means that someone else should make a better solution.

I just pointed out that I won't be the one who creates the better solution, 
because for fundamental reasons I don't see the libertas+cfg80211 approach 
going forward. That issue has nothing to do with you or your patch, so please 
don't feel offended or confused.


Basically, I neither ack nor nak you patch. Given that it fixes an oops the 
patch should go in, and probably to stable at well. I just gave a hint, to 
make you think if you could come up with something better.



BTW, testing/fixing of failure paths in libertas as well as simplifying the 
call sequence of functions during initialisation could be quite useful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/