Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.29.x - 2.6.31.1] module: fix__module_ref_addr()

From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Mon Mar 29 2010 - 22:22:59 EST


* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:07 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:09:46PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > > This patch does not apply to 2.6.34-rc, and the code in upstream looks
> > > > to have been fixed. Should this go to stable?
> > >
> > > Yes. 2.6.34-rc does not have this issue anymore, but the patch is needed in
> > > -stable.
> >
> > Why is this not in .34-rc2? Can you find the specific patch in Linus's
> > tree that solves this and let stable@xxxxxxxxxx know about it?
> >
>
> Looks like it was this commit:
>
> commit e1783a240f491fb233f04edc042e16b18a7a79ba
> Author: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Jan 5 15:34:50 2010 +0900
> module: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters
>
> Mathieu's fix was:
>
> - return (local_t *) (mod->refptr + per_cpu_offset(cpu));
> + return (local_t *) per_cpu_ptr(mod->refptr, cpu);
>
> As Mathieu states in his change log, the bug is that the mod->refptr is
> outside the assembly obfuscation of the per_cpu_offset(). This allows
> the compiler to optimize and cause a NULL pointer dereference with the
> manipulation of per cpu data.
>
> Christoph Lameter's change fixes this bug as a side effect:
>
> -static inline local_t *__module_ref_addr(struct module *mod, int cpu)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - return (local_t *) (mod->refptr + per_cpu_offset(cpu));
> -#else
> - return &mod->ref;
> -#endif
> -}
> -
> /* Sometimes we know we already have a refcount, and it's easier not
> to handle the error case (which only happens with rmmod --wait). */
> static inline void __module_get(struct module *module)
> {
> if (module) {
> - unsigned int cpu = get_cpu();
> - local_inc(__module_ref_addr(module, cpu));
> + preempt_disable();
> + __this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->count);
> trace_module_get(module, _THIS_IP_,
> - local_read(__module_ref_addr(module, cpu)));
> - put_cpu();
> + __this_cpu_read(module->refptr->count));
> + preempt_enable();
> }
> }
>
> By removing the buggy code all together.

Exactly. Steven has beaten me on the start line on this one. ;)

Thanks,

Mathieu

>
> -- Steve
>
>

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/