Re: [PATCH -tip 5/7] perf probe: Query basic types from debuginfo

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:29PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> +static void convert_variable_type(Dwarf_Die *vr_die,
> +				  struct kprobe_trace_arg *targ)
> +{
> +	Dwarf_Die type;
> +	char buf[16];
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (die_get_real_type(vr_die, &type) == NULL)
> +		die("Failed to get a type information of %s.",
> +		    dwarf_diename(vr_die));
> +
> +	ret = die_get_byte_size(&type) * 8;
> +	if (ret) {
> +		/* Check the bitwidth */
> +		if (ret > MAX_BASIC_TYPE_BITS) {
> +			pr_warning("  Warning: %s exceeds max-bitwidth."
> +				   " Cut down to %d bits.\n",
> +				   dwarf_diename(&type), MAX_BASIC_TYPE_BITS);
> +			ret = MAX_BASIC_TYPE_BITS;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = snprintf(buf, 16, "%c%d",
> +			       die_is_signed_type(&type) ? 's' : 'u', ret);
> +		if (ret < 0 || ret >= 16)
> +			die("Failed to convert variable type.");
> +		targ->type = xstrdup(buf);

Question, should we use the equivalent to panic'ing the kernel in the
userspace bits in tools/?

I tend to see all code there as potentially part of a library, i.e. to
be callable by some unantecipated new tool or library that would rather
receive a return value telling it that the operation can't be performed
for some reason so that it can inform the user instead of having the
whole tool exit to the command line.

It may well be that some specific operation needs lots of resources but
many other don't, panic'c because the one that requires lots of
resources can't be performed, bringing down a gui/tui is really nasty.

Perhaps the answer will be the same as for when people added panic calls
in the kernel in the past, "you're screwed up anyway if that happens",
but it just feels wrong :-\

In the DWARF bits it has even the added twist namespace collapse with
DIE 8-)

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/