Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf/core, x86: implement ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSELbit masks

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Mar 29 2010 - 12:49:14 EST


On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:36 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -454,20 +454,7 @@ static __initconst u64 atom_hw_cache_event_ids
>
> static u64 intel_pmu_raw_event(u64 hw_event)
> {
> -#define CORE_EVNTSEL_EVENT_MASK 0x000000FFULL
> -#define CORE_EVNTSEL_UNIT_MASK 0x0000FF00ULL
> -#define CORE_EVNTSEL_EDGE_MASK 0x00040000ULL
> -#define CORE_EVNTSEL_INV_MASK 0x00800000ULL
> -#define CORE_EVNTSEL_REG_MASK 0xFF000000ULL
> -
> -#define CORE_EVNTSEL_MASK \
> - (INTEL_ARCH_EVTSEL_MASK | \
> - INTEL_ARCH_UNIT_MASK | \
> - INTEL_ARCH_EDGE_MASK | \
> - INTEL_ARCH_INV_MASK | \
> - INTEL_ARCH_CNT_MASK)
> -
> - return hw_event & CORE_EVNTSEL_MASK;
> + return hw_event & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK;
> }

Could you fold this with your 2/3 and create x86_pmu_raw_event() which
lives in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c, that's more consistent wrt
the X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK name and that way you don't need to re-order the
#include ""s either.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/