Re: [Patch] fix packet loss and massive ping spikes with PPP multi-link

[James Carlson]

Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Also, I am not sure if it would not be better to default to no
> fragmentation and enable it optionally. I am aware that changing default
> behaviour is always a bit of a problem but to the best of my knowledge
> enabling fragmentation is a bug in any and all real-world applications.

It worked well and was enabled by default on all the Bay Networks
equipment I used ~15 years ago.  And I know for certain that we tested
with other gear (Ascend and Clam, probably) that did it right.

If it works with the equipment you're using, it's a useful feature in
that it can balance out the latencies among the links, resulting in much
lower overall latency observed by higher layers -- especially so on
lower-speed links where MP is more likely to be used.  Without it,
you're left either waiting for the one slow link choking on a big packet
to catch up, or (worse) disabling the sequence headers altogether,
resulting in reordering unless you're really "clever."

It's a darned shame that lame implementations would force a change in
the default ...

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/