Re: set_cpus_allowed_ptr

[Julia Lawall]

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Would it make sense to clean up the set_cpus_allowed() vs
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr() mess using the semantic patch tool?
> 
> I guess it would be three patches:
>  1) converting the current remaining set_cpus_allowed() users into
>     set_cpus_allowed_ptr().
>  2) remove set_cpus_allowed().
>  3) rename set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to set_cpus_allowed()

Perhaps a subtlety is that set_cpus_allowed is creating a new variable, 
whose address it sends to set_cpus_allowed_ptr?

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/