Re: [PATCH RFC] fix problems with NETIF_F_HIGHDMA in networking drivers v2

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:03:37 -0600
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This seems like it could be a reasonable approach. The only thing is
> that in this code you're returning 1 if the parent device has no DMA
> mask set. Wouldn't it make more sense to return 0 in this case? I'm
> assuming that in that situation it's a virtual device not backed by
> any hardware and there should be no DMA mask restriction...

I chose the safer option because I don't know enough how net_device
structure is used. If returning zero in such case is always safe, it's
fine by me. any example of such virtual device driver?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/