Re: [patch] mfd: off by one calculating size

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Dan,

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:12:42PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that it should be + 1 here.  It's an off by one, because
> we start counting at zero.
Thanks Dan, patch applied to my for-next branch.

Cheers,
Samuel.


> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Found by a static checker and untested.  Please review carefully.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/timberdale.h b/drivers/mfd/timberdale.h
> index 8d27ffa..902c451 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/timberdale.h
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/timberdale.h
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
>  
>  #define CHIPCTLOFFSET	0x800
>  #define CHIPCTLEND	0x8ff
> -#define CHIPCTLSIZE	(CHIPCTLEND - CHIPCTLOFFSET)
> +#define CHIPCTLSIZE	(CHIPCTLEND - CHIPCTLOFFSET + 1)
>  
>  #define INTCOFFSET	0xc00
>  #define INTCEND		0xfff

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/