Re: what the patches do Re: [RFC 10/15] PM / Hibernate: user, implementuser_ops reader

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

On 25/03/10 16:30, Pavel Machek wrote:
[...]

> I have some problems with sws_module_ops interface (handcoded locking
> is too ugly to live), but it is better than I expected. But there may
> be better solution available, one that does not need two interfaces to
> maintain (we can't really get rid of userland interface). What about
> this?

Just picking up on that bracketed part: Can we flag the userland 
interface (and uswsusp) as being planned for eventual removal now... or 
at least agree to work toward that?

I'm asking because if we're going to make a go of getting the in-kernel 
code in much better shape, and we have Rafael, Jiri and I - and you? - 
all pulling in the same direction to improve it, there's going to come a 
point (hopefully not too far away) where uswsusp is just making life too 
difficult, and getting rid of it will be a big help.

Regards,

Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/