Re: [PATCH] trace power_frequency events on the correct cpu (forIntel x86 CPUs)

[Arjan van de Ven]

On 3/23/2010 9:57, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 March 2010 17:28:36 Robert Schöne wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 06:57 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> > > On 3/22/2010 0:04, Robert Schöne wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 17:42 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> > > > > On 3/20/2010 14:37, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It also seem to be (hopefully) a minor feature for timechart, so this should
> > > > > > not hurt that much (yet).
> > > > >
> > > > > It's actually a major feature for timechart, and one of the key things I and a bunch of others
> > > > > inside Intel use timechart for.
> > > > It's a major feature for us too.
> > > > I suppose, the cpufreq_notify_transition calls are correct (meaning
> > > > being called for all related cpus) for every driver. So there's still
> > > > the option to include it in the POST_CHANGE section of this function.
> > > > Could this be okay for the both of you?
> > >
> > > post change would work... that gets frequency afaik..
> > Are you ok with this too, Thomas?
> You mean hooking it into cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans() in
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c?

no


hooking into the post frequency change callback that gets done..
which is guaranteed to be on the right cpu afaics.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/