Re: [PATCH] trace power_frequency events on the correct cpu (forIntel x86 CPUs)

[Robert Schöne]

Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 06:57 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> On 3/22/2010 0:04, Robert SchÃne wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 17:42 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> >> On 3/20/2010 14:37, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> >>
> >>> It also seem to be (hopefully) a minor feature for timechart, so this should
> >>> not hurt that much (yet).
> >>
> >> It's actually a major feature for timechart, and one of the key things I and a bunch of others
> >> inside Intel use timechart for.
> >>
> > It's a major feature for us too.
> > I suppose, the cpufreq_notify_transition calls are correct (meaning
> > being called for all related cpus) for every driver. So there's still
> > the option to include it in the POST_CHANGE section of this function.
> > Could this be okay for the both of you?
> 
> post change would work... that gets frequency afaik..
Are you ok with this too, Thomas?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/