Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 22:54, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 21:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my killfile
>> > with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch from you.
>>
>> Does this mean you disagree with that? (I think it's pretty factual, last i
>> checked the usage stats of devel kernels was somewhere around 99.7%.)
>
> I disagree with that being a relevant argument in the technical
> discussion on the relative merits of two implementations of a given
> facility. I also disagree with your numbers, if you talk about
> deployement, I would be very very surprised if ARM wasn't close to
> on-par with x86.

FWIW, several years ago a MontaVista representative said there were more Linux
units that did have their RT extensions than there were Linux units
that did not have them...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/