Re: [RFC Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bondingdevices

[Cong Wang]

Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 04:17 -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> > This whole patchset is for adding netpoll support to bridge and bonding
> > devices. I already tested it for bridge, bonding, bridge over bonding,
> > and bonding over bridge. It looks fine now.
>
> Ages ago, Jeff Moyer took a run at this, added him to the cc: on the off
> chance he still cares.
>
> > Please comment.
> >
> >
> > To make bridge and bonding support netpoll, we need to adjust
> > some netpoll generic code. This patch does the following things:
> >
> > 1) introduce two new priv_flags for struct net_device:
> >    IFF_IN_NETPOLL which identifies we are processing a netpoll;
> >    IFF_DISABLE_NETPOLL is used to disable netpoll support for a device
> >    at run-time;
>
> This one is a little worrisome. I've tried to keep the netpoll code
> restricted to as tight an area as possible. Adding new flags like these
> that random drivers might try to fiddle with seems like a good way for a
> driver writer to get in trouble. Also flag space is filling up.


Somewhat, but currently I don't have other way to replace this.
Any suggestions?

> > 2) introduce three new methods for netdev_ops:
> >    ->ndo_netpoll_setup() is used to setup netpoll for a device;
> >    ->ndo_netpoll_xmit() is used to transmit netpoll requests;
> >    ->ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is used to clean up netpoll when a device is
> >      removed.
>
> Seems like a lot of interface for something to be used by only a couple
> core drivers. Hopefully Dave has an opinion here.

Yeah, I worry about this too, maybe we can group those methods
for netpoll together into another struct, and just put a pointer
here?

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/