Re: [PATCH 02/10] x86: fix out of order of gsi - full

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> +extern int gsi_delta;

  Is this really necessary ? See below.

> +int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi);

  unsigned int please

> +unsigned int irq_to_gsi(int irq);

  Ditto

> @@ -446,11 +448,11 @@ void __init acpi_pic_sci_set_trigger(unsigned int irq, u16 trigger)
>  
>  int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq)
>  {
> -	*irq = gsi;
> +	*irq = gsi_to_irq(gsi);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
>  	if (acpi_irq_model == ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC)
> -		setup_IO_APIC_irq_extra(gsi);
> +		setup_IO_APIC_irq_extra(gsi, irq);

  Please do not propagate that pointer.

    	 *irq = setup_IO_APIC_irq_extra(gsi);

  Also these changes have a total lack of comments. Why do we modify
  *irq here depending on the setup_IO_APIC_irq_extra() results ?

>  #endif
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -914,6 +916,40 @@ static void save_mp_irq(struct mpc_intsrc *m)
>  		panic("Max # of irq sources exceeded!!\n");
>  }
>  
> +/* By default isa irqs are identity mapped to gsis */
> +static unsigned int isa_irq_to_gsi[NR_IRQS_LEGACY] = {
> +	0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
> +};
> +
> +int gsi_delta;

  Please make this static and provide a function to modify it from
  probe_ioapic_i8259().

  Also the variable name is horrible. What's the delta here ? It's an
  offset, right ?

> +int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi)

unsigned int

> +{
> +	unsigned int irq = gsi;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	irq += gsi_delta;

  Please make that:

  	 unsigned int i, irq = gsi + gsi_delta;

> +	for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS_LEGACY; i++) {
> +		if (isa_irq_to_gsi[i] == gsi) {
> +			irq = i;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return irq;
> +}
> +
> +unsigned int irq_to_gsi(int irq)

  unsigned int please

> +{
> +	unsigned int gsi;
> +
> +	if (irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
> +		gsi = isa_irq_to_gsi[irq];
> +	else
> +		gsi = irq - gsi_delta;
> +
> +	return gsi;
> +}
> +
>  void __init mp_override_legacy_irq(u8 bus_irq, u8 polarity, u8 trigger, u32 gsi)
>  {
>  	int ioapic;
> @@ -945,6 +981,8 @@ void __init mp_override_legacy_irq(u8 bus_irq, u8 polarity, u8 trigger, u32 gsi)
>  	mp_irq.dstirq = pin;	/* INTIN# */
>  
>  	save_mp_irq(&mp_irq);
> +
> +	isa_irq_to_gsi[bus_irq] = gsi;

>  }
>  
>  void __init mp_config_acpi_legacy_irqs(void)
> @@ -974,7 +1012,7 @@ void __init mp_config_acpi_legacy_irqs(void)
>  	/*
>  	 * Locate the IOAPIC that manages the ISA IRQs (0-15).
>  	 */
> -	ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(0);
> +	ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(irq_to_gsi(0));
>  	if (ioapic < 0)
>  		return;
>  	dstapic = mp_ioapics[ioapic].apicid;
> @@ -1057,6 +1095,7 @@ int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)

  Why is mp_register_gsi global ? It's only used in
  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c

>  {
>  	int ioapic;
>  	int ioapic_pin;
> +	int irq;

  irq is unsigned int.

>  	struct io_apic_irq_attr irq_attr;
>  
>  	if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC)
> @@ -1079,11 +1118,12 @@ int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)
>  		gsi = ioapic_renumber_irq(ioapic, gsi);
>  #endif
>  
> +	irq = gsi_to_irq(gsi);
>  	if (ioapic_pin > MP_MAX_IOAPIC_PIN) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "Invalid reference to IOAPIC pin "
>  		       "%d-%d\n", mp_ioapics[ioapic].apicid,
>  		       ioapic_pin);
> -		return gsi;
> +		return irq;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (enable_update_mptable)
> @@ -1092,9 +1132,9 @@ int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)
>  	set_io_apic_irq_attr(&irq_attr, ioapic, ioapic_pin,
>  			     trigger == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 0 : 1,
>  			     polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
> -	io_apic_set_pci_routing(dev, gsi, &irq_attr);
> +	io_apic_set_pci_routing(dev, irq, &irq_attr);
>  
> -	return gsi;
> +	return irq;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1151,8 +1191,10 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_ioapic_entries(void)
>  	 * If BIOS did not supply an INT_SRC_OVR for the SCI
>  	 * pretend we got one so we can set the SCI flags.
>  	 */
> -	if (!acpi_sci_override_gsi)
> -		acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt, 0, 0);
> +	if (!acpi_sci_override_gsi) {
> +		int irq = gsi_to_irq(acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt);

  unsigned int. New line between variable declaration and code.

> +		acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(irq, acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt, 0, 0);
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Fill in identity legacy mappings where no override */
>  	mp_config_acpi_legacy_irqs();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index a917fdf..61b59ef 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ int mp_irq_entries;
>  /* GSI interrupts */
>  static int nr_irqs_gsi = NR_IRQS_LEGACY;
>  
> +static int boot_ioapic_idx;
> +
>  #if defined (CONFIG_MCA) || defined (CONFIG_EISA)
>  int mp_bus_id_to_type[MAX_MP_BUSSES];
>  #endif
> @@ -1032,7 +1034,7 @@ static inline int irq_trigger(int idx)
>  int (*ioapic_renumber_irq)(int ioapic, int irq);
>  static int pin_2_irq(int idx, int apic, int pin)
>  {
> -	int irq, i;
> +	int irq;

  Can we please do a cleanup of irq variables to use unsigned
  int. That should be done as a separate patch.

>  	int bus = mp_irqs[idx].srcbus;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1044,18 +1046,28 @@ static int pin_2_irq(int idx, int apic, int pin)
>  	if (test_bit(bus, mp_bus_not_pci)) {
>  		irq = mp_irqs[idx].srcbusirq;

  Can we simply return mp_irqs[idx].srcbusirq here and get rid of the
  else path ident level ?

>  	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * PCI IRQs are mapped in order
> -		 */
> -		i = irq = 0;
> -		while (i < apic)
> -			irq += nr_ioapic_registers[i++];
> -		irq += pin;
> +		unsigned int gsi;

  New line please

> +		if (!acpi_ioapic) {
> +			int i;

  

> +			/*
> +			 * PCI IRQs are mapped in order
> +			 */
> +			i = gsi = 0;
> +			while (i < apic)
> +				gsi += nr_ioapic_registers[i++];
> +			gsi += pin;
> +		} else
> +			gsi = pin + mp_gsi_routing[apic].gsi_base;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>  		/*
>                   * For MPS mode, so far only needed by ES7000 platform
>                   */
>  		if (ioapic_renumber_irq)
> -			irq = ioapic_renumber_irq(apic, irq);
> +			gsi = ioapic_renumber_irq(apic, gsi);
> +#endif
> +
> +		irq = gsi_to_irq(gsi);
>  	}
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> @@ -1505,9 +1517,10 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(void)
>  	struct irq_cfg *cfg;
>  	int node = cpu_to_node(boot_cpu_id);
>  
> +	apic_id = boot_ioapic_idx;
> +
>  	apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, KERN_DEBUG "init IO_APIC IRQs\n");
>  
> -	for (apic_id = 0; apic_id < nr_ioapics; apic_id++)
>  	for (pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_registers[apic_id]; pin++) {
>  		idx = find_irq_entry(apic_id, pin, mp_INT);
>  		if (idx == -1) {
> @@ -1529,9 +1542,6 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(void)
>  
>  		irq = pin_2_irq(idx, apic_id, pin);
>  
> -		if ((apic_id > 0) && (irq > 16))
> -			continue;
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * Skip the timer IRQ if there's a quirk handler
>  		 * installed and if it returns 1:
> @@ -1565,7 +1575,7 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(void)
>   * but could not use acpi_register_gsi()
>   * like some special sci in IBM x3330
>   */
> -void setup_IO_APIC_irq_extra(u32 gsi)
> +void setup_IO_APIC_irq_extra(u32 gsi, unsigned int *pirq)
>  {
>  	int apic_id = 0, pin, idx, irq;
>  	int node = cpu_to_node(boot_cpu_id);
> @@ -1585,6 +1595,7 @@ void setup_IO_APIC_irq_extra(u32 gsi)
>  		return;
>  
>  	irq = pin_2_irq(idx, apic_id, pin);
> +	*pirq = irq;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
>  	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>  	if (desc)
> @@ -2028,6 +2039,30 @@ void __init enable_IO_APIC(void)
>  	clear_IO_APIC();
>  }
>  
> +static void __init probe_ioapic_i8259(void)
> +{
> +	/* probe boot ioapic idx */
> +	boot_ioapic_idx = ioapic_i8259.apic;

  boot_ioapic_idx is an apic id. Why is the variable name suggesting
  it's an index ?

> +	if (boot_ioapic_idx < 0)
> +		boot_ioapic_idx = find_isa_irq_apic(0, mp_INT);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +	if (!acpi_disabled && acpi_ioapic && boot_ioapic_idx < 0)
> +		boot_ioapic_idx = mp_find_ioapic(irq_to_gsi(0));
> +#endif
> +	if (boot_ioapic_idx < 0)
> +		boot_ioapic_idx = 0;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +	if (mp_gsi_routing[boot_ioapic_idx].gsi_base) {
> +		gsi_delta = NR_IRQS_LEGACY;
> +		nr_irqs_gsi += NR_IRQS_LEGACY;
> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "new nr_irqs_gsi: %d\n", nr_irqs_gsi);
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
> +	printk(KERN_INFO "boot_ioapic_idx: %d\n", boot_ioapic_idx);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Not an __init, needed by the reboot code
>   */
> @@ -3045,7 +3080,7 @@ static inline void __init check_timer(void)
>  				legacy_pic->chip->unmask(0);
>  			}
>  			if (disable_timer_pin_1 > 0)
> -				clear_IO_APIC_pin(0, pin1);
> +				clear_IO_APIC_pin(apic1, pin1);

  How is this change related to this patch ? It looks more like an
  independent fix.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/