Re: [PATCH] trace power_frequency events on the correct cpu (forIntel x86 CPUs)

[Robert Schöne]

Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 17:42 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> On 3/20/2010 14:37, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> 
> > It also seem to be (hopefully) a minor feature for timechart, so this should
> > not hurt that much (yet).
> 
> It's actually a major feature for timechart, and one of the key things I and a bunch of others
> inside Intel use timechart for.
> 
It's a major feature for us too.
I suppose, the cpufreq_notify_transition calls are correct (meaning
being called for all related cpus) for every driver. So there's still
the option to include it in the POST_CHANGE section of this function.
Could this be okay for the both of you?


-- 
Robert Schoene
Technische Universitaet Dresden
Zentrum fuer Informationsdienste und Hochleistungsrechnen
01062 Dresden

Tel.: (0351) 463-42483, Fax: (0351) 463-37773
E-Mail: Robert.Schoene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/