Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues.

[Kevin Easton]

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 00:20 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:

...

> > Well, the thing is that
> > 
> > * Anything remotely modern (>= XP) doesn't give a hoot about cylinder
> >   alignment.
> > 
> > * Anything older (<= 2000) is very likely to get confused with custom
> >   geometry starting from the BIOS itself.  For those cases, the only
> >   thing we can do is aligning partitions to cylinders abiding BIOS
> >   supplied geometry parameters which will usually be 255/63.
> > 
> > So, using custom geometry doesn't help compatibility at all.
> 
> Our partitioning tool still obey the integral cylinder rule ... we can
> argue about whether they should, but what we need is a strategy for
> fixing what is rather than what should be.

James / Tejun,

Can't we fix the problem by defaulting to aligning partitions to
start on an LBA that is a multiple of 64260 ?

Such partitions will always be 4KiB-aligned, *and* start-of-cylinder
aligned (assuming 255/63, as seems to be the norm).

Sure, that reduces your partition granularity to almost-32-MiB, but
that's pretty small potatoes these days (and it's only a *default*, so
you could always override that if you really cared, and didn't need 
the compatibility).

    - Kevin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/