Re: RAID + LUKS + LVM performance
From: david
Date: Thu Mar 11 2010 - 12:51:30 EST
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
On 11.03.2010 13:08, Mathias Buren wrote:
Hi,
(please cc me as I'm not subscribed)
I've a friend who's going to set up a fileserver consisting of 8x 1.5TB
HDDs, an 8-port PCI-E RAID card (Areca ARC-1220 @
http://www.areca.com.tw/products/pcie.htm ) etc.
The plan is create a RAID5 array spanning all the disks, then create 4
partitions. These 4 partitions would be encrypted using LUKS (Twofish or
AES256).
These 4 encrypted partition would be set up in RAID0 using Linux' software
(mdadm), then LVM would be used on top of that (one big PV, one big VG and
a big LV or so).
The reason for this is that kcryptd is not multithreaded (afaik). By having
4 encrypted partitions, then md0 on top of them, I'm forcing 4 kcryptd
processes to run on all four cpu cores whenever something is written to the
disks, which should improve (encryption) performance.
Is this a good way of doing it, or is there a smarter way?
The setup you describe would only work with SSDs. HDDs would seek
themselves to death.
The problem is the RAID-0 over the 4 partitions. At that point you would
need, instead of the 4 partitions, something that is round-robin. So
that the mapping of the (physical) blocks from the upper to the lower
would be effectivly linear/unchanged.
AFAIK something like that is (currently) not possible.
linux software raid (the md tools) support linear or striped modes for
raid0, so what you are looking for is available.
however I think that defeats part of the OPs purpose, which was to try and
spread the I/O across all 4 partitions to be able to use multiple cores
for the encryption.
David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/