Re: [patch 2/2] x86: Manage ENERGY_PERF_BIAS based on cpufreqgovernor

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2010-03-05 20:55:22, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:40:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> > That can be only true if it does not give benefits period... AC and
> > battery power are quite different scenarios.
> 
> No, they're not.

Yes, they are.

Would you care to elaborate? I may very well want top power on AC
power, and max powersavings on battery; most people do.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/