Re: Merge of the 'write_inode' branch from the VFS tree

[Trond Myklebust]

On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 15:48 +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> Or I can do a new branch, put updated pair of patches there (hch has sent
> the updated variants my way) and ask you to rebuild NFS tree.  Which will
> also suck, since it adds PITA for you and you are completely innocent in
> that clusterfuck.
> 
> Suggestions?  I'd love to get out of that mess with minimal PITA for
> everyone involved and minimally messed tree...

Hi Al,

I'd be fine with rebuilding the NFS tree. I have all the patches which
depend on write_inode in their own separate branch anyway, so I'd only
have to rebase that branch and then merge it with the main NFS client
tree...

Cheers
  Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/