Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpuset,mm: use rwlock to protect task->mempolicyand mems_allowed

[Nick Piggin]

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 06:52:39PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> if MAX_NUMNODES > BITS_PER_LONG, loading/storing task->mems_allowed or mems_allowed in
> task->mempolicy are not atomic operations, and the kernel page allocator gets an empty
> mems_allowed when updating task->mems_allowed or mems_allowed in task->mempolicy. So we
> use a rwlock to protect them to fix this probelm.

Thanks for working on this. However, rwlocks are pretty nasty to use
when you have short critical sections and hot read-side (they're twice
as heavy as even spinlocks in that case).

It's being used in the page allocator path, so I would say rwlocks are
almost a showstopper. Wouldn't it be possible to use a seqlock for this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/