Re: [PATCH] hpet: factor timer allocate from open

From: Magnus Lynch
Date: Wed Mar 03 2010 - 21:59:38 EST


On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> @@ -438,6 +469,17 @@ hpet_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>  {
>>        struct hpet_dev *devp;
>>
>> +       switch (cmd) {
>> +       case HPET_INFO:
>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               {
>> +                       int r = hpet_alloc_timer(file);
>
> Applications might want to use HPET_INFO to find out which timer they
> got, so I think the driver cannot avoid allocating a timer in this case.

Oh, I missed commenting this in my first reply. I chose to make
HPET_INFO specify timer -1 in case a timer isn't currently allocated.
You think there are extant cases of programs depending on open then
immediate HPET_INFO having a timer allocated? Seems obscure to me. If
so I can change that. I did add the explicit form of allocating timers
to accomodate such a case hypothetically (open, allocate timer, get
info).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/