Re: [PATCH 00/24] Rename kernel's magic sections for compatibilitywith -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections

[Michal Marek]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:03:46PM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> 
> > Here is a new version of the -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections patch
> > series based on current Linus tree.
> 
> Aside from patch 17, which I would prefer that Haavard review, these 
> patches look correct (and patch 17 can be safely dropped).  Please 
> consider the rest of Denys' patches in this patch series
> 
> Acked-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.


> [...]
>
> Michal, what are your thoughts on this patch series?  The kbuild tree 
> would be a reasonable path for merging these patches.

Yes it would. I'm sorry, I was a bit bussy last two weeks. I'll do some
random tests and add the patches to kbuild-next now. The patches look
simple enough for me and don't actually change any functionality if one
doesn't deliberately use -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections, so I hope
Linus will be fine with merging it for 2.6.34.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/