Re: [PATCH -tip v3&10 02/18] kprobes: Introduce generic insn_slotframework

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> * Masami Hiramatsu (mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>> Make insn_slot framework support various size slots.
>>> Current insn_slot just supports one-size instruction buffer slot. However,
>>> kprobes jump optimization needs larger size buffers.
>>
>> OK, so you end up having one insn slot cache for kprobes and one insn
>> slot (eventually) for the static jump patching (which needs larger
>> instruction slots than kprobes). That seems like a good way to ensure
>> you do not use more memory than necessary.
>>
>> We could possibly go even further and automatically use the right insn
>> slot cache given the size of the instruction entry that must be added (a
>> bit like the memory allocator which have different pools for each
>> allocation order).
> 
> Sure, that will be simpler interface.
> 
>> Possibly that using the terminology of "memory pools" rather than
>> "cache" could be a better fit too. So what this really becomes is an
>> instruction slot allocator and garbage collector.
> 
> Ah, right. It would be better to rename kprobe_insn_pool() :)

Hmm, I tried it. And finally, I found that this doesn't help
to simplify code... Maybe it is better to postpone it until
another user needs this feature.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/