Re: [rfc/rft][patch] should use scheduler sync hint intcp_prequeue()?

[Mike Galbraith]

On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:27 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> This wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll() change might be good for loopback
> communications (and pleases tbench), but is it desirable for regular
> multi flows NIC traffic ?

If you can take high frequency cache misses, likely yes.  For localhost,
that's pretty much guaranteed currently (ergo the question).

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/