Why use this? Why not just set the domain type to HVM, and leave theA annoy thing in pv drivers is that it would test if the domain type is _NOT_
"status" field as a bitset of available paravirtualizations?
XEN_NATIVE. So set the domain to XEN_HVM_DOMAIN would result in PV driver
initialization then probably panic. Maybe we can do something to PV drivers,
as patch 6 and a part of patch 7.
Part of pv_ops are overlapped. I would try if a new file would bring much
duplicate.
I think we need a aligned page, as hypercall page.+ .align PAGE_SIZE_asmWhy does this need to be defined in asm? Can't it be either allocated
+ENTRY(shared_info_page)
+ .skip PAGE_SIZE_asm
+.popsection
or defined in C?
I think "status" is a misnomer here. Isn't it specifically a set of PVCould you give a suggestion of the name? I am not a native English speaker...
features which are active?