Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix atomic64_add_unless return value convention

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 03/01/2010 09:14 AM, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> Return values 0 and 1 were swapped both in the generic implementation and
> my x86-32 one.
> 
> The x86-32 and atomic64_test.c patches should probably be squashed in the
> appropriate commits in tip/x86/atomic

We tend to be very reluctant to do that.

Anyway, please resend your patches with actual patch descriptions
(commit messages).

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/