Re: Panic in reserve_memtype()

From: Jack Steiner
Date: Mon Mar 01 2010 - 10:11:57 EST


On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:05:18PM -0600, Jack Steiner wrote:

> >
> > I guess I found an obvious problem in the code. Can you check whether the
> > below patch resolves the panic you are seeing.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Venki
>
>
> Works great!! Thanks...


Venki

Were you planning to push this fix upstream? Both the x86 & linux-next tree
currently fail to boot on EFI-enabled systems because of this bug.

Thanks...


--- jack
>
>
> >
> >
> > new->type should only change when there is a valid ret_type. Otherwise
> > requested type and return type should be same.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> > index e4cd229..58b6de1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> > @@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ int rbt_memtype_check_insert(struct memtype *new, unsigned long *ret_type)
> > new->type, ret_type);
> >
> > if (!err) {
> > - new->type = *ret_type;
> > + if (ret_type)
> > + new->type = *ret_type;
> > +
> > memtype_rb_insert(&memtype_rbroot, new);
> > }
> > return err;
> > --
> > 1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/